Across each of the four days of the live, immersive, installation experience, there were seven sessions available. Participants were encouraged to book for a session and there was also capacity for people without a booking to attend. Some sessions had a maximum capacity of two participants, and others three. I was testing whether the variation of capacity made any difference to the participant experience. I allowed one hour for each session, which included:
Ten minutes for external onboarding which occurred outside RMIT Building 4, on Bowen Street, and involved me going over Participant Information Consent Forms, ensuring that participants were aware of their rights and setting some basic expectations for the experience.
Five minutes of internal onboarding with an actor playing an in-world character (more detail provided below).
Thirty minutes maximum inside the installation experience.
Fifteen minutes for installation reset and adaptions, and for participants to willing take part in a face-to-face survey outside of the installation/experience.
Honouring Mr. Stevens (HMS), Notes from Day 1 Monday Feb 24th, 2025
Monday February 24th was the first day of the installation. Overwhelmingly, for this first day, my overview/impression, is that participants felt welcomed, through the style and scripting used in “onboarding”. Onboarding is a term used in immersive theatre that describes how the creator can help their audience feel comfortable and how the audience learns about what they may/may not do in the event (Medium 2021). An actor playing an in-world character (“in world” meaning the character comes from the installation environment and does not belong in/is distinct from in the world outside that environment), was provided to enable participants to transition into the world(s) of the installation and to enable participants know what they could do in the installation, encouraging them to explore the two HMS spaces fully.
The installation was supposed to feel like a domestic environment and a deceased estate. I divided the room that housed the installation into two main spaces: one space I refer to as the “small space” and the second as the “large space”. To move between the small through to the large space, I created a transitional space - a wardrobe. Participants needed to pass through a sliding door and into the wardrobe. Once inside, there was shadow puppetry for some sessions and for all sessions a ball of red wool floating in mid air, behind a framed, perspex window. Participants exited the wardrobe through a second sliding door to make their way into the large space. Generally, across the small, large and transitional (wardrobe) spaces, I observed that participants opened drawers, moved things around, played with objects, gasped, giggled and “ooooed” and “aaahhed” at their discoveries in each space, and transitioned through the wardrobe seamlessly into the large space.
On this first day of the installation there was no visible performer inside the installation. Some sessions included shadow puppetry (the puppeteer was concealed in a hidden section of the wardrobe) and others did not. The shadow puppet screen was hidden by a tapestry during the sessions without shadow puppetry so participants, should they have recognised the framed shadow puppetry screen as a site for puppetry, would not hold expectations of shadow puppetry, nor experience fear of missing out. Across this first day, I have not overheard or spoken to anyone who was impacted by the shadow puppetry as a particularity of the experience.
What surprised me was that some elements I had placed into the installation, with no expectation of eliciting playfulness, became sites for creative play. I had placed a vintage, pink, floral hexagonal box in the small space, which contained a 1950’s black, fur-rimmed shawl. I placed the box into the small space because it was an aesthetic fit. The box became a place of intrigue and people pulled out and played with the shawl. One participant walked around wearing shawl, taking it into the large space, however I feel that this participant was deliberate in his performativity because of his and my relationship. In the past I have been his mentor and have employed this person on two projects. He, along with his partner who I also know, played quite performatively in the large space in particular. I made a decision to step out of the large space, withdrawing myself from their eyeline, but still able to hear, to see if this made any difference to the pair’s behaviour. Once out of sight, I overheard one say to the other “Well what’s the point with no one here watching?”. The impact of the researcher as observer was very obvious in this instance. I wonder about the impact of the researcher as observer, and propose to overcome this obstacle in future iterations.
In one end of the large space I had positioned a green children’s table setting (referred to from here on in as “children’s table”), comprised of a small, squarish, green table with four lift-up seats. I had placed small plastic dolls in each of the lift-up seats. Some participants discovered these, some did not, but most of those who did find the dolls pulled them out and played with them at the table, making worlds or scenarios.
Also on the table, I had placed a line of pieces of red wool, as a set-up prop ready for the performer/Minotaur (referred to here on in as “Minotaur”) who would be in place from Tuesday onwards. Many participants sat at the table and played with the wool, creating patterns, shapes, and in some cases combined these with the dolls in world building. I am certain that with a Minotaur at the table that this play will be arrested as participants will be a) expecting the Minotaur to “do something” – perform, and therefore participants will place themselves in the position of audience members who “receive” performance. Also, given the parameters of the experience, the borderless nature of exploring, I believe participants will find the Minotaur’s presence a barrier to play.
Adjacent to the children’s table I had positioned Christmas tree, with warm-coloured fairly lights, but no other decoration. Under the Christmas tree I had placed pink-wrapped gifts. Each gift contained a variety of plastic animal mask - dog, cat, wolf, chicken and rabbit. The gifts under the Christmas tree have been problematic – meaning, they have been a threshold to participation. Most participants have been reluctant to open a gift. We experimented with several variations in the actor/character onboarding script, to encourage participants to cross this threshold to open the gifts. Dashiel Agar, who has been conducting surveys, observed that people wouldn’t open the gifts because we are conditioned not to do so. Liam Misuraca, art assistant, suggested gift tags – which I had been considering, but his idea prompted me to add gift tags with “For You” attached to a gift (maybe one – maybe more – need to test).
Here is detail of the original onboarding material created with the actors. This was adapted across the four days of the presentation.
ONBOARDING MATERIAL AND SCRIPT
Before meeting the host, participants were onboarded with the PhD information from outside.
OPENING CHARACTER – Hostess/Host - Rose/Tom (referred to as “hostess”)
Props:
· Clipboard + pen
· Pink-wrapped gift parcel
· Brass bell
Arriving at the top of the stairs, participants, two or three at a time, are greeted by the hostess. She is dressed in a 1950s house coat, with pearls and hair tied up neatly. The host wears a vintage suit and tie. The hostess is high status but operates with kindness. The hostess is genuinely curious about each participant, and, armed with a clipboard and pen, must ask participants to complete a survey before they enter the experience. The hostess records the answers on a paper on the clipboard.
SURVEY SCRIPT
ROSE/TOM: Hello and welcome to Honouring Mr. Stevens. My name is Rose/Tom. First, may I have your first name? In turn, if you please:
Jot these down.
ROSE/TOM: Thank you. Now I have three questions to ask you each before you enter. Please take your time, and I will note down your answers as we go along. Are you ready? Would you rather:
1. Fast or Slow?
Jot down their answers (F or S)
2. Canine Feline OR Vulpine? (Which means fox-like - explain if participants ask. Jot the numbers with their answers (C, F or V)
3. Knowing OR Not Knowing (K or NK)
Jot down their answers (K or NK)
Thank you very much. This is very informative to the research. (Slightly tongue in cheek but delivered seriously). Before you go in, a reminder that you have around 30 minutes inside, but you can leave at any time. When it is time to leave, you will hear me ring this bell (gently ring bell). Inside, feel free to touch, explore, open and close drawers or whatever you find, and rearrange things as you please. If you do go through a door, please close it after you. Lastly, please move in a clockwise direction only. Lastly, there is tea and vegan treats, should you choose to imbibe. This way please.
Lead them to the three doors, make a selection but choose to let them through the one on the right. Then just before they go inside choose one participant and give them a pink-wrapped gift parcel. To this participant: